Embarking
on this venture to acquire an understanding of the notion of writing social
identity is truly a bipolar experience. Whether it is merely a question of
being pulled and pushed in opposing directions or suffering on the threshold of
a mental disorder, or rather the balance of one’s mind being disturbed, has yet
to be decided.
I
just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in, would be appropriate
in the circumstances. At the outset one feels a certain assurance that one is
on a track little travelled by. The
concept of innovation strolling around the brain, synapses happily engaged in
thought, is a pleasant sensation; however, the feeling is soon engulfed by the
plethora of ideas and references contained in the first text one picks up, and
the pleasant feeling subsides from the realisation that the strolling concept
of innovation reveals a cavernous dearth of knowledge and ideas about the
brain. The synapses cease to tingle, the neurons hover and the transmitting
pulses subside.
The
little travelled track has become Oxford Street on a Sunday, the Fifth Avenue
Easter Parade, Bastille Day on the Champs-Élysées, May Day
in Moscow. Yet, by and by one comes upon a text that re-inspires, taking one
again off piste on the precarious,
perilous, expectant amble towards elusive innovation. This state of being does not last long. It is,
after all, elusive; and so one embarks on fleeting flights of erratic and
ephemeral wanderings. There is never a straight line. Spirals constantly
crisscrossing, occasionally allowing a glimpse of light in some clearing in the
beyond.
I
have only begun the formalities or registration. Can I really do this for three
or more years?
No comments:
Post a Comment