The 8th of January turns up
another load of bull. There is something about a papal bull that takes
performance writing to a very different level, in particular during the 15th
century. It gave license, by the mere stroke of a pen, to certain friends of
the Bishop of Rome to do just about anything they wanted in carving up the
world as they began to explore it. This freedom to colonise and enslave was
promoted by Pope after Pope.
Romanus
Pontifex is a papal
bull written on the 8th January 1455
by Pope Nicholas V to King Afonso V of Portugal. As a follow-up to the Dum Diversas, it confirmed to the Crown
of Portugal dominion over all lands discovered or conquered during the Age of
Discovery. Along with encouraging the seizure of the lands of Saracen Turks and
pagans, it repeated the earlier bull's permission for the enslavement of such
peoples. The bull's primary purpose was to forbid other Christian nations from
infringing the King of Portugal's rights of trade and colonisation in these
regions.
Nicholas V |
Dum Diversas (Until different) is a papal bull
issued on 18 June 1452 by Pope Nicholas V, that is credited by some with
"ushering in the West African slave trade." It authorized Afonso V of
Portugal to conquer Saracens and pagans and consign them to "perpetual
slavery. Pope Calixtus III reiterated the bull in 1456 with Etsi cuncti,
renewed by Pope Sixtus IV in 1481 and Pope Leo X in 1514 with Precelse
denotionis. The concept of the consignment of exclusive spheres of
influence to certain nation states was extended to the Americas in 1493 by Pope
Alexander VI with Inter caetera.
Dum Diversas provided:
"We grant you [Kings of Spain and
Portugal] by these present documents, with our Apostolic Authority, full and
free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and
pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be, as
well as their kingdoms, duchies, counties, principalities, and other property
[...] and to reduce their persons into perpetual slavery.”
By what authority these Popes granted
this freedom to pillage is open to question. Apostolic Authority is a rather
loose concept. Does it derive from apostolic succession, authority handed down
from the apostles through those with whom they came in contact and were chosen
to carry on the teachings of Christ?
Former Archbishop of Canterbury Michael Ramsey described three
meanings of "apostolic succession":
1-
One bishop succeeding another in the same
see meant that there was a continuity of teaching: "while the Church as a
whole is the vessel into which the truth is poured, the Bishops are an
important organ in carrying out this task".
2-
The bishops were also successors of the
apostles in that "the functions they performed of preaching,
governing and ordaining were the same as the Apostles had performed".
3-
It is
also used to signify that "grace is transmitted from the Apostles by
each generation
of bishops through the imposition of hands".
At what point did ‘blessed
are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth’ become ‘reduce their persons into perpetual slavery’?
Perhaps it’s a form of Chinese whispers. I don’t see much truth being poured
into vessels with that sort of authority.
Here’s a bit of a You Tube entry which explains it
all, if you can believe it. What would we do without American preachers? Ain’t no chains on me.
No comments:
Post a Comment